A plain copyright notice for your bio, three versions to copy, and an honest account of what a disclaimer does and does not do when your content gets reposted.
Free to join · Low fees · Fast, private payouts · Updated July 2026
Create your account in seconds, it’s free.
Sign up with emailBy signing up you confirm you are at least 18 years old and agree to our Terms & Privacy.
Already have an account? Log in
A copyright disclaimer is a short notice in your bio stating that you own your content and that reproducing, screenshotting, or reselling it is prohibited. It does not create your copyright, because you already own every photo and video automatically the moment you record it. What the notice does is remove any excuse: it puts every subscriber on explicit written notice, which supports a claim of willful infringement later, and it deters the casual reposter. The removal work itself is done by DMCA notices, not by the disclaimer.
Half the disclaimers circulating in creator bios are copy-pasted nonsense citing statutes that do not apply, and a few cite laws that do not exist. A short, accurate notice does more for you than a long, wrong one. Here is what to write and what it buys you.
Use one. Longer is not stronger.
All content on this page is my original work and is protected by copyright. Screenshotting, recording, downloading, or reposting is prohibited. Violations are reported and removed.
Copyright 2026. All photos, videos, and messages on this page are my original work, protected under United States copyright law. Your subscription grants you personal access only. You may not copy, screenshot, record, download, distribute, resell, or repost any content, in whole or in part, anywhere, for any reason. Unauthorized use is reported to hosts and search engines and pursued under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Copyright 2026, all rights reserved. Every image, video, audio file, and message on this page is my original copyrighted work. Access is a personal, non-transferable license to view. Any reproduction, screenshot, screen recording, download, redistribution, resale, or republication is infringement and is not authorized by me, my agents, or the law. All content is watermarked and traceable to the account it was issued to. Infringing material is reported to hosting providers, search engines, and payment processors, and accounts found distributing it are terminated and referred for legal action.
Four honest things. It gives explicit notice, so nobody can claim they believed sharing was permitted, and that matters because willful infringement carries statutory damages up to $150,000 per work instead of the ordinary range. It sets the terms of access in writing, framing the subscription as a personal viewing license rather than a purchase of the file. It deters the casual sharer, who is most of the problem, since organized leak operations were never going to be deterred by text. And it documents your ownership claim with a date, which is useful evidence when two accounts both claim the same content.
It does not create, register, or strengthen your copyright, which exists automatically from the moment of creation. It does not stop screenshots, since no platform can reliably prevent a second device pointed at a screen. It does not remove anything from the internet on its own; only a DMCA notice or a platform report does that. It does not let you sue, because filing an infringement suit in US federal court requires the Copyright Office to have acted on a registration first. And it does not bind people who never saw it, which includes everyone who encounters your content after it has already been reposted elsewhere.
| Placement | Why it helps |
|---|---|
| Page bio | Every subscriber sees it before paying, which is what makes the notice explicit. |
| Welcome message | Delivered to each new subscriber individually and timestamped in the chat log. |
| Watermark on media | Travels with the file, so the claim survives the repost and identifies the source. |
| Pinned post | Visible to fans who never read bios, and easy to screenshot as evidence yourself. |
Several templates circulating in creator communities cite the Berne Convention, the Uniform Commercial Code, or a "Facebook privacy notice" style declaration. None of those apply to a subscription page, and the UCC ones are recycled sovereign citizen filler. Others promise a fixed penalty, along the lines of a set dollar amount per screenshot. You cannot set your own damages by announcement; damages come from the statute or from a contract a court will enforce, and an unread bio line is neither. A disclaimer that cites the wrong law reads as unserious to exactly the audience you want to take you seriously, which includes any host reviewing your later takedown notice.
Yes, and it costs nothing. A notice in the form of the word Copyright, the year of first publication, and your stage name is the traditional format, and while it has not been legally required in the US since 1989, it still communicates ownership instantly and removes the innocent infringement defense that can otherwise reduce damages. Use your stage name rather than your legal name if you work under one; your legal identity does not need to be public for the notice to be valid.
Registration is optional for owning content and required for suing over it. As of July 2026 the online Single Application costs $45 and the Standard Application $65, and the Copyright Office has proposed raising standard online registration to $85 while eliminating the Single Application, with the final schedule sent to Congress in July 2026. Registering before an infringement, or within three months of publishing, is also what unlocks statutory damages of $750 to $30,000 per work and up to $150,000 for willful infringement, plus attorney fees. Most creators never need it. Creators who have been leaked at scale, or who intend to pursue an identifiable US-based reposter, should register the affected work.
Order of impact, from a creator who has dealt with a leak: watermark everything in a spot that cropping cannot fix; keep original files and their metadata; put a plain disclaimer in the bio and the welcome message; run a reverse image search on your most popular content once a month; file DMCA notices to the host and to Google the same day you find a leak; and register the work only if you plan to go further than takedowns. The disclaimer is step three, not step one, and it works because of what follows it.
One more structural point. The leaks that hurt most are the ones that pull subscribers away from a page you are only keeping 80% of. On a platform with a flat 10% fee, each subscriber you retain is worth more, so the same protection effort returns more money.
A short, accurate disclaimer supports a willful infringement claim. A long one citing the wrong statute does not.
Framing a subscription as a personal viewing license, in writing, is what makes reposting an obvious breach rather than an argument.
Most reposting comes from ordinary subscribers, not organized leak operations, and those are the people a clear notice stops.
Protection effort pays back more on a flat 10% platform, because every subscriber you keep is worth more per head.
Sign up in seconds with email, pick a creator name, and set up your profile. No upfront cost.
Upload photos and videos, set a monthly subscription price, and lock premium posts behind pay-per-view.
Fans subscribe, tip and unlock your content. You keep more with low fees and fast, discreet payouts.
Join HerFans today, it’s free to start. Build your community and get paid for what you love.
