We read FunWithFeet’s site and terms on 5 September 2026. It publishes 100,000 sellers against 8,000 buyers, $2.1M paid out since 2021, and no commission rate anywhere in its terms.
Free to join · One flat fee · Private payouts on request
Create your account in seconds. It’s free.
Sign up with emailBy signing up you confirm you are at least 18 years old and agree to our Terms & Privacy.
Already have an account? Log in
FunWithFeet is legit. It is a real marketplace, it verifies sellers with a KYC check, and it pays out. The fee question is where every review you will read gets it wrong, in both directions. We read FunWithFeet’s own site and its terms of use on 5 September 2026, and here is what they say: the sell page states in plain words that FunWithFeet "does not take any commission from seller earnings," and the terms of use contain no percentage at all. Not one. The company describes its own revenue as seller membership fees plus a small cut when buyers top up their wallet.
That matters because the figure repeated across most 2026 review sites is a 15% commission on sales, presented as a verified fact. It is not what the company publishes. It may reflect the wallet cut, it may be stale, or it may be right and simply undocumented. What we can tell you is that FunWithFeet does not confirm it anywhere a seller can read, and reserves the right to adjust compensation rates without naming any.
We got this wrong on this page ourselves until this update, and we would rather correct it than leave it. HerFans is a competing platform, so we are not neutral. That is exactly why this page sticks to what each company publishes about itself.
| What each platform publishes | FunWithFeet | FeetFinder | HerFans |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commission stated on its own site | None. It states sellers keep 100% | 90% Basic, 100% Premium by its 2026 terms | a flat 20% |
| Any percentage in the terms of use | Zero. The document contains no % sign | Yes, in its terms and its FAQ, which do not match | Yes |
| Where the company says it earns | Seller membership fees, plus a cut of buyer wallet top-ups | Commission on sales | Commission on sales |
| Seller subscription | Yes, a membership fee to open a shop | $4.99 or $14.99 a month | None |
| Right to change your rate | Reserved, with no rate published | Published rate per plan | Flat rate, published |
The honest summary: FunWithFeet is cheap to sit on and takes nothing from your sales. The membership fee to open a shop is widely reported at around $14.99 for six months, roughly $2.50 a month, and that figure has been stable across sources for a while. Beyond it, its sell page says sellers keep 100% of what they sell, and its money comes from the membership plus a cut of the wallet top-ups that buyers pay. The one caveat is that its terms reserve the right to change compensation without publishing a rate, so check the sell page again before you rely on it.
This is the part worth your attention, and it comes entirely from FunWithFeet’s own marketing rather than from any critic. Its seller page advertises 100,000+ active sellers and $2.1M+ paid to sellers. Its home page advertises 8,000+ buyers.
| Self-published figure | FunWithFeet | FeetFinder |
|---|---|---|
| Sellers | 100,000+ active sellers | Not published separately |
| Buyers | 8,000+ buyers | Not published separately |
| Total members | Not published | 12,000,000+ verified users |
| Money moved | $2.1M+ paid to sellers | $125,000,000+ spent |
| Items sold | Not published | 15,000,000+ pics and videos |
| Implied by their own numbers | $21 per seller, and 12.5 sellers per buyer | About $8.33 per item sold |
Do the division. $2.1 million spread across 100,000 sellers is $21 per seller, for the entire life of the platform since 2021. And 100,000 sellers against 8,000 buyers is 12.5 sellers competing for every buyer on the site. Both numbers are the company’s own, sitting on its own pages, and neither is a figure a critic invented.
Compare it with what FeetFinder publishes about itself: 12 million verified users, $125 million spent, and 15 million pics and videos sold, which works out at about $8.33 per item. FeetFinder does not break out how many of those users are sellers, so we are not going to compute a per-seller figure for it and neither should anyone else. But the gap in money moved, $2.1 million against $125 million, is not close.
This is the single most useful thing to understand about FunWithFeet. It is not a scam and it is not expensive. It is quiet. Almost every negative review describes the same thing, and the company’s own numbers explain why.
Yes. FunWithFeet is a legitimate business, not a scam. It is operated by Gyco Online Limited, registered in England and Wales at Kemp House, 152-160 City Road, London. Its terms require every seller to pass a KYC check including government-issued identification and proof of address, money moves through the platform rather than between strangers, and sellers withdraw from a wallet.
Legitimate and profitable are separate questions, and confusing them is how sellers end up disappointed. A real company can still be a bad place to earn if 12.5 sellers are chasing each buyer. Judge the membership fee as a business expense that has to earn itself back, not as a test of whether the company is honest. On honesty, it passes.
Reasonably, and safer than selling through direct messages with strangers. Sellers are ID-verified, payments run inside the platform, and you never hand bank details to a buyer. That removes the two classic feet pic scams: the buyer who vanishes after you send the photos, and the buyer who pays with a stolen card.
Two risks remain that no platform removes. Your photos can be saved and reposted, so watermark everything and keep faces, tattoos and recognizable rooms out of frame. And you are handing a government ID to a company registered overseas, which is a genuine privacy trade-off worth weighing rather than waving away. Sellers also report buyers pushing to move to Snapchat or Telegram. Never do it. The moment you leave the platform you lose the protection you paid for.
Be careful with the review scores in both directions. Trustpilot has no profile at all for funwithfeet.com. The reviews sit under funwithfeet.co.uk, which held 128 reviews at 4.4 out of 5 when we checked on 31 August 2026, plus a second profile at funwithfeet.us with 6 reviews at 4.1. A score built on 128 reviews is a weak signal next to a platform carrying thousands.
The pattern in the written reviews is more useful than the number, and it is consistent: the dominant complaint is not theft, it is silence. Sellers pay, upload, and wait for buyers who arrive slowly or never. The positive reviews come overwhelmingly from sellers who brought their own audience. In the 20 most recent reviews, 15 were 4 or 5 star, and of those 6 described how easy signup was while only 2 mentioned selling anything or getting paid. A review left on the day you register tells you about the signup form, not about whether you will earn.
One more thing worth knowing when you read any FunWithFeet review: the company runs a partner program that pays recurring commission on referred buyers and referred sellers, and hands affiliates 10% discount codes to share. So does FeetFinder. Nearly every ranked review of either platform is written by someone who gets paid when you sign up.
This comparison gets quoted constantly and it is misleading without the context. We pulled both Trustpilot profiles on 31 August 2026.
| Trustpilot, checked 31 Aug 2026 | FunWithFeet (.co.uk) | FeetFinder |
|---|---|---|
| Displayed score | 4.4 out of 5 | 3.0 out of 5 |
| Total reviews | 128 | 3,712 |
| Raw average of all ratings | 4.43 | 4.49 |
| Share left in the last 12 months | 100% | 8.0% |
| Negative reviews answered | 0% of 13 | 91.4% of 162 |
Look at the raw averages: 4.43 for FunWithFeet, 4.49 for FeetFinder. Nearly identical. The displayed scores are 4.4 and 3.0. The entire visible gap comes from Trustpilot weighting recent reviews more heavily, combined with a large difference in profile age. Every one of FunWithFeet’s 128 reviews was left in the last twelve months, so its displayed score and its lifetime average agree. FeetFinder has 3,712 reviews going back years and only 8.0% are recent, so a smaller and more critical recent group sets its number. We break that dataset down in our analysis of FeetFinder reviews on Reddit and Trustpilot.
So the 4.4 does not show that FunWithFeet treats sellers better. It mostly shows a young review profile. There is a fair reading the other way too: FeetFinder replies to 91.4% of its negative reviews and FunWithFeet has replied to none of its 13. A company answering complaints in public is doing something the other is not.
Start from the platform’s own arithmetic: $21 per seller across the life of the site. Most new sellers make between nothing and a couple of hundred dollars a month, and plenty make nothing at all in month one. Realistic prices are $5 to $30 for a single photo, $20 to $50 for a set, and $20 to $200 for custom work. Because the membership fee is small, break-even is genuinely low, which is the platform’s best honest argument.
The screenshots showing thousands a month come from sellers who arrived with an audience already built. That is true on every marketplace in this niche, and anyone promising $500 for one photo is selling a course, not a plan. Our full breakdown of realistic prices is in how much feet pics sell for.
FeetFinder has the buyers. FunWithFeet is cheaper to sit on and, per its own sell page, takes no commission from your sales. Which side you want depends entirely on whether you can drive your own traffic.
If you cannot, buyer traffic is the only thing you are actually shopping for, and the $125 million against $2.1 million answers that question. If you can bring buyers from Reddit or X, then you are only renting shelf space, the cheaper shelf wins, and a platform with no monthly fee at all only comes out ahead in the months you sell little or nothing. We compare the whole field in best sites to sell feet pics, the no-subscription options are in selling feet pics without a subscription, and the bigger rival gets the same treatment in our FeetFinder review.
It is worth about $2.50 a month as a second storefront and it is not worth building income on. At that price the membership is close to free, nothing stops you listing on several marketplaces at once, and adding it costs little beyond upload time.
What it will not do is find you buyers, which is the job marketplaces sell and the one FunWithFeet is weakest at by its own published numbers. Use it as extra shelf space while you build an audience you control, then sell to that audience somewhere the rate is published, flat, and not subject to a monthly meter.
a flat 20%, published and the same on every sale. You are not left inferring your own cut from third-party blog posts.
Nothing at all when you do not sell. No membership to earn back before you are in profit.
Subscriptions, bundles, tips, customs and pay-per-view, so one repeat buyer can spend many times over.
Your handle baked into every photo and video, country blocks, and a creator name shown to fans instead of your legal name.
Sign up in seconds with email, pick a creator name, and set up your profile. No upfront cost.
Upload photos and videos, set a monthly subscription price, and lock premium posts behind pay-per-view.
Fans subscribe, tip and unlock your content. You ask for a payout from your dashboard once your available balance reaches the published minimum. Each sale is pending for 30 days, the period in which refunds and most card disputes arrive, and 10% of it is held as a reserve until day 120. For a sale paid by card, the reserve is held longer, up to day 206, because our card processor keeps its own reserve on that payment for 26 weeks and it is released to you once it has been returned to us.
Join HerFans today. It’s free to start. Build your community and get paid for what you love.